The Supreme Court's refusal to hear the appeal marks the end of a pivotal decade-long fight against fossil fuel policies.
Supreme Court Declines Climate Appeal, Ending Landmark Youth Case
Supreme Court Declines Climate Appeal, Ending Landmark Youth Case
A significant environmental challenge comes to a close as youths' case against the government is dismissed.
The Supreme Court announced on March 24, 2025, that it would not entertain an appeal concerning the landmark climate case Juliana v. United States, a pivotal lawsuit initiated by 21 young activists against the federal government. This decision concludes a decade-long legal battle that aimed to hold the government accountable for actions perceived to contribute to climate change through the support of fossil fuel industries.
The plaintiffs contended that the government's policies violated their constitutional rights, asserting a fundamental duty to protect the environment for future generations. However, in a ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the judges dismissed the case, stating that the issues brought forth were beyond the court's purview and should instead be addressed by the political entities responsible for making policy decisions.
“Our Children’s Trust,” the nonprofit law group representing the plaintiffs, took one last legal approach last year. They petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the Ninth Circuit's ruling, hoping to take the case to trial in a lower court. On Monday, the Supreme Court denied this petition, effectively concluding the case.
Experts had voiced concerns about the potential consequences of pushing the case forward, fearing that a conservative Supreme Court might leverage this appeal to eliminate existing environmental protections.
The Juliana case, despite its dismissal, has inspired a wave of similar climate litigation across the country, creating a framework for advocates to challenge climate inaction at various levels of government.
The plaintiffs contended that the government's policies violated their constitutional rights, asserting a fundamental duty to protect the environment for future generations. However, in a ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the judges dismissed the case, stating that the issues brought forth were beyond the court's purview and should instead be addressed by the political entities responsible for making policy decisions.
“Our Children’s Trust,” the nonprofit law group representing the plaintiffs, took one last legal approach last year. They petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the Ninth Circuit's ruling, hoping to take the case to trial in a lower court. On Monday, the Supreme Court denied this petition, effectively concluding the case.
Experts had voiced concerns about the potential consequences of pushing the case forward, fearing that a conservative Supreme Court might leverage this appeal to eliminate existing environmental protections.
The Juliana case, despite its dismissal, has inspired a wave of similar climate litigation across the country, creating a framework for advocates to challenge climate inaction at various levels of government.
