Virginia Man Convicted in Double Murder Linked to Au Pair Affair

Tue Feb 03 2026 03:44:59 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

Brendan Banfield, a former IRS officer, has been found guilty of murdering his wife and a man allegedly lured to the home as part of a plot fueled by an affair with their au pair. The trial revealed shocking details about the case, including evidence of a sinister scheme that involved impersonation and staged violence.

In a dramatic conclusion to a high-stakes trial, Brendan Banfield was convicted of the murders of his wife Christine and Joseph Ryan. Prosecutors argued that Banfield conspired with Juliana Magalhães, their Brazilian au pair and his lover, to create a narrative of self-defense. Magalhães has since testified against Banfield. The case raises serious questions about the couple's deceitful actions and has captivated the public's attention.

A Virginia man having an affair with his family’s Brazilian au pair was convicted Monday of murdering his wife and another man, whom prosecutors believe was lured to the house as a scapegoat.

Brendan Banfield, a former IRS law enforcement officer, claimed he stumbled upon Joseph Ryan attacking his wife, Christine Banfield with a knife on February 24, 2023, leading him to shoot Ryan. Eventually, the au pair, Juliana Magalhães, shot Ryan as well.

However, prosecutors argued Banfield fabricated the story, presenting a theory that suggested the murders were part of a premeditated plot to eliminate Christine. Evidence soon revealed that Banfield and Magalhães were involved in a romantic affair, complicating the narrative further.

Magalhães, who pleaded guilty to manslaughter in 2024, testified against Banfield, admitting they had impersonated Christine on a fetish website to lure Ryan to their home. The plan included a staged scene that portrayed Ryan as an intruder attacking Christine.

Banfield’s defense attorney, John Carroll, challenged the credibility of Magalhães’ testimony, suggesting her cooperation with police was motivated by a desire to reduce her own potential sentencing. Banfield labeled the prosecution’s claims as “absolutely crazy” during his own testimony.

Evidence presented during the trial included dissension within the police regarding the investigation’s direction, as an officer had indicated there was reason to believe Christine was behind the social media account used to deceive Ryan.

In her closing arguments, prosecutor Jenna Sands directed the jury’s attention to the multitude of evidence supporting their case, including expert analyses that suggested evidence of Christine’s blood on Ryan’s hands.

After nearly nine hours of deliberation over two days, the jury reached a verdict, and Banfield now faces a potential life sentence. Meanwhile, Magalhães awaits sentencing.