Skip to main content
MetaWorld Media
PoliticsA federal judge has ruled that a federal prosecutor, John Sarcone, was unlawfully serving in his role when he issued subpoenas related to investigations involving New York Attorney General Letitia James. The ruling emphasizes the importance of following statutory procedures in executive branch appointments and has implications for investigations perceived as politically motivated.

Judge Disqualifies Federal Prosecutor in Letitia James Investigation

A ruling by U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield disqualifies acting U.S. attorney John Sarcone from overseeing investigations related to New York Attorney General Letitia James, citing illegal appointment procedures by the Justice Department.

Source: AP2 min read
Judge Disqualifies Federal Prosecutor in Letitia James Investigation
Image via AP

In brief

In an unexpected turn, a New York district judge has disqualified acting U.S. attorney John Sarcone from handling subpoenas related to New York Attorney General Letitia James. The ruling emphasizes a failure to follow legal protocols in his appointment, illuminating broader implications regarding political influence in legal investigations. James has faced scrutiny over her legal actions against former President Trump, claiming the oversight is part of a politically charged campaign against her.

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — A judge disqualified a federal prosecutor from overseeing investigations into New York Attorney General Letitia James, ruling Thursday that he had been serving in his post unlawfully when he requested subpoenas.

U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield blocked subpoenas requested by John Sarcone, the acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of New York.

The judge said the Department of Justice did not follow statutory procedure after judges declined to extend Sarcone’s tenure. “When the Executive branch of government skirts restraints put in place by Congress and then uses that power to subject political adversaries to criminal investigations, it acts without lawful authority. Subpoenas issued under that authority are invalid. The subpoenas are quashed, and Mr. Sarcone is disqualified from further participation in the underlying investigations.”

James, a Democrat, had challenged Sarcone’s authority after he issued subpoenas seeking information about lawsuits she filed against President Donald Trump, claiming he had committed fraud in his business dealings, and separately against the National Rifle Association and some of its former leaders.

Justice Department lawyers say Sarcone was appointed properly and that the subpoenas were valid. James claims the inquiry into her lawsuits is part of a campaign of baseless investigations and prosecutions of Trump’s perceived enemies.

The judge said the Justice Department did not follow statutory procedure after judges declined to extend Sarcone’s tenure. “Instead, on the same day that the judges declined to extend Mr. Sarcone’s appointment, the Department took coordinated steps — through personnel moves and shifting titles — to install Mr. Sarcone as Acting U.S. Attorney. Federal law does not permit such a workaround.”

James’ office issued a statement calling Thursday’s ruling “an important win for the rule of law.”

“We will continue to defend our office’s successful litigation from this administration’s political attacks,” the statement said.

The ruling is the latest to address the legality of unusual maneuvers the Trump administration has performed to try and keep its favored candidates for U.S. attorney in those jobs indefinitely, without going through the usual process of getting them confirmed in the U.S. Senate.

Sarcone was part of Trump’s legal team during the 2016 presidential campaign and worked for the U.S. General Services Administration as the regional administrator for the Northeast and Caribbean during Trump’s first term.

Topics

More on this story