As protests surge over intensified ICE raids, the Trump administration's controversial immigration policies raise questions about targeting practices that affect not only criminals but also undocumented migrants, tourists, and activists. A significant proportion of those detained are reported to have no criminal backgrounds, igniting debate about the legal and ethical implications of these actions.
The Impact of Trump's Immigration Policies on Detained Migrants

The Impact of Trump's Immigration Policies on Detained Migrants
An overview of the scope and consequences of arrests made by ICE under the Trump administration, reflecting growing protests and diverse cases of detainees.
In the wake of Donald Trump's assertive promise to launch "the largest deportation programme of criminals in the history of America," the landscape of U.S. immigration enforcement has undergone a substantial transformation. Initially hailed by many as a decisive response to illegal immigration, a closer examination reveals significant repercussions for diverse groups, including migrant workers, students, and even tourists encountering visa issues.
Recent developments surrounding intensified ICE raids have sparked considerable unrest in major cities like Los Angeles, where demonstrators have rallied against perceived overreach and the treatment of undocumented migrants. Under Trump's policies, about 51,000 undocumented individuals found themselves in ICE detention facilities—a record high dating back to September 2019.
Traditionally focused on those with criminal backgrounds, the Trump administration's definition of "criminal" has broadened alarmingly to include individuals who are otherwise law-abiding. According to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, as of June 1, 44% of those in ICE detention had no criminal history prior to their undocumented status. This paints a troubling picture that defies the administration's narrative of targeting "the worst of the worst."
The recent surge of protests ignited following raids in Los Angeles that led to the arrest of 118 individuals, only a fraction of whom had any substantiated criminal connections, raising concerns about the legitimacy and ethical implications of such widespread detentions.
Tourists have also found themselves caught up in these immigration measures. High-profile incidents include a 28-year-old Welsh citizen held for 19 days due to an entry denial by Canada, and Khaby Lame, a prominent TikTok influencer, detained at a Las Vegas airport for overstaying his visa. These cases reflect the administration's increasing scrutiny of non-nationals, provoking worries within host countries regarding their citizens' safety and treatment while visiting the U.S.
The administration's reach extends beyond borders, with hundreds of Salvadoran nationals labeled as "alien enemies" being deported, often with little proof of gang ties. Similarly, students engaged in political protests have faced severe repercussions, with many enduring unlawful detentions and the revocation of visas due to their activism, casting doubt on the commitment to uphold due process.
While ICE defends its measures as legally justified and necessary for public safety, the mounting backlash underscores a critical conversation about the changing definition of immigration enforcement in America. As a reported 1,600 international students have faced visa revocations, advocates emphasize that legal protections must not be overshadowed by the administration’s aggressive deportation agenda.
The ripple effect of these policies continues to raise alarm, as citizens and officials alike voice concerns about the potential long-term damage to U.S. relationships with other nations and the fundamental rights of residents and visitors who now navigate an increasingly precarious immigration landscape.