MIAMI (AP) — A top Washington lobbyist closely tied to former President Donald Trump revealed in federal court that he severed ties with former Congressman David Rivera upon discovering that the Miami Republican had secured a $50 million contract from the Venezuelan government. This shocking revelation contrasted with their mutual goal of undermining Nicolás Maduro's regime.
Brian Ballard's testimony has offered insights into the trial of Rivera, who stands accused of secretly lobbying for Maduro without proper registration as a foreign agent. As the trial unravels the intrigues surrounding efforts to manipulate U.S. policy on Venezuela, it has exposed the intertwining ambitions of political players both in Washington and Caracas.
Allegations have surfaced suggesting that Rivera utilized his long-standing connections with key Republican figures, including Ballard and Senator Marco Rubio, to promote a softer approach towards Venezuela's ruling regime.
Rivera, 60, maintains his innocence, claiming that his role as a business strategist with a U.S. affiliate of Venezuela's oil company exempts him from violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). Prosecutors assert that Rivera's actions since leaving Congress have deflected from genuine democratic support for Venezuela, instead leveraging his political ties for personal gain.
During ongoing testimony — featuring texts, emails, and detailed lobbying records — Ballard expressed feelings of betrayal at Rivera's alleged machinations. The defense's claims of unfair prosecution were dismissed by Judge Melissa Damian after a recent motion for a mistrial.
Ballard, who solidified his lobbying practice while in the Florida legislature alongside Rivera, has shared the exponential growth of his firm, which reportedly garnered $88 million in fees by 2025. His frustrations escalated when Rivera proposed representing anti-Maduro opposition leaders, igniting a mixture of old friendships and newfound ethical dilemmas, primarily against the backdrop of the Trump administration's foreign policy shaping toward Caracas.
With connections deepening, the testimony also spotlighted Raúl Gorrín, a Venezuelan media mogul embroiled in corruption scandals, who sought to influence Trump’s policies favorably toward Venezuela's political opposition. This saga evidences the precarious nature of foreign influence campaigns within American politics and brings to light pressing questions about the moral fabric of political lobbying.
As the trial unfolds, it raises critical concerns over the integrity of U.S. political operations in relation to foreign powers and the implications of such engagements for American democracy.





















