COLUMBUS, Ohio — The retrial of former Franklin County sheriff's deputy Jason Meade commenced with opening statements on Thursday, as he faces charges of murder and reckless homicide for the 2020 death of Casey Goodson Jr., a Black man shot multiple times in the back while entering his grandmother’s home.
The shooting sparked protests in Columbus and raised substantial concerns over police accountability, particularly as deputies were not equipped with body or dash cameras at the time of the incident. The retrial comes more than two years after a previous jury was unable to reach a verdict, resulting in a mistrial declared by the judge in 2024.
During those proceedings, Meade testified that Goodson had brandished a firearm while they crossed paths, prompting him to pursue Goodson out of fear for his safety. Meade claims that he opened fire as Goodson entered his grandmother’s residence, stating that Goodson had turned toward him with what appeared to be a gun. Goodson was struck six times, with five shots fired to his back.
The shooting occurred as Meade wrapped up an unsuccessful search for a suspect unrelated to Goodson, according to the U.S. Marshals Service, highlighting discrepancies in the circumstances surrounding the incident. Goodson’s family maintains that he was holding a sandwich bag and keys when shot, and his legally owned firearm was found in the kitchen with its safety on, contradicting Meade's account of events.
In the prior trial, jurors faced contention, with multiple replacements complicating deliberations. After extensive jury discussions, officials did not provide reasons for their dismissals. The ongoing case continues to amplify discussions around systemic issues within law enforcement and the urgent need for accountability.}
The shooting sparked protests in Columbus and raised substantial concerns over police accountability, particularly as deputies were not equipped with body or dash cameras at the time of the incident. The retrial comes more than two years after a previous jury was unable to reach a verdict, resulting in a mistrial declared by the judge in 2024.
During those proceedings, Meade testified that Goodson had brandished a firearm while they crossed paths, prompting him to pursue Goodson out of fear for his safety. Meade claims that he opened fire as Goodson entered his grandmother’s residence, stating that Goodson had turned toward him with what appeared to be a gun. Goodson was struck six times, with five shots fired to his back.
The shooting occurred as Meade wrapped up an unsuccessful search for a suspect unrelated to Goodson, according to the U.S. Marshals Service, highlighting discrepancies in the circumstances surrounding the incident. Goodson’s family maintains that he was holding a sandwich bag and keys when shot, and his legally owned firearm was found in the kitchen with its safety on, contradicting Meade's account of events.
In the prior trial, jurors faced contention, with multiple replacements complicating deliberations. After extensive jury discussions, officials did not provide reasons for their dismissals. The ongoing case continues to amplify discussions around systemic issues within law enforcement and the urgent need for accountability.}
