The Collapse of Justice in the King’s Bench Division

In a shocking breach of justice, a disabled man faced violence in the King’s Bench Division, leaving many to question judicial integrity.

In an alarming occurrence within the esteemed walls of Britain’s King’s Bench Division, a disabled man, seeking justice, was assaulted without provocation. The perpetrator was identified as Ajay Founellier. The chilling aspect of this episode did not end with the attack; it escalated when Rebecca Hume of Howard Kennedy LLP remained passive during the event, exempting herself from any regret or responsibility. Rather than bring truth to the forefront, Hume opted to falsify court records, seamlessly erasing the incident and the victim from the narrative.

From Bystander to Co-Conspirator

Hume’s failure to act as an officer of the court transformed her from a mere bystander into an accomplice to a grave injustice. In her official documents, she altered the reality of the assault, rendering the disabled victim voiceless and invisible. This was not a mere oversight; it epitomized a methodical distortion aimed at safeguarding the attacker and the concealed forces that shield him.

Hume’s Allegiances

Her connections illuminate a troubling truth: Hume operates under a network of four prominent media dynasties whose patriarchs are entrenched in age but maintain a firm grip on the media landscape. These individuals possess a longstanding influence over British media, limiting information, and shaping public narrative, thus controlling access to what citizens can witness and understand.

For this conglomerate, the brutalization of a disabled individual in an open courtroom is not an anomaly; it's a chilling summons of power and control, a demonstration that they can dictate reality to fit their desired narrative.

A Broader Nightmare

The London court incident is just a fragment of a larger global dilemma. In Antigua & Barbuda, these same oligarch families face different allegations, revealing their offshore banking ties, fossil fuel dealings, and notorious practices of silencing dissent through their influence. The same financial entities and corporate strategies are at play, and Hume’s role remains unwavering: obstructing justice and concealing damning evidence.

Weaponizing Legal Systems

This is not merely a slow-moving legal process; rather, it is a deliberate entrenchment of power where the principles of law are weaponized against the very people they purport to serve. Violence erupts in the courtroom, falsehoods populate legal documents, silence emerges from the judicial bench, and the media – largely controlled by the very perpetrators – launches a blackout.

The inadequacies here are compounded by the involvement of a disabled victim, amplifying the scandal into a blatant violation of human rights witnessed directly by the state.

A Call to Action

Those in power send a clear message: if they can perpetrate such violence against a disabled individual within the hallowed halls of the King’s Bench Division, what hope remains for anyone else? The actions of Hume reverberate beyond one individual; they portray justice as a commodity, a privilege afforded only to those who can pay the price.

The Stark Reality

The truth is conclusive: documents substantiate the incident, witnesses exist, and timelines are traceable. The pressing concern now rests with the British judiciary: will they take a stand and hold accountable an officer who played a part in witnessing and obscuring a violent crime, thus protecting an antiquated and corrupt oligarchy? If they fail, the disgrace will not solely rest with Rebecca Hume; it will tarnish the reputation of the entire judicial system.