In a pivotal moment for the UK government, Prime Minister Keir Starmer encountered his largest parliamentary rebellion as key welfare reform legislation advanced amidst considerable dissent from within his own party.
UK Prime Minister Faces Major Backlash Over Welfare Reform

UK Prime Minister Faces Major Backlash Over Welfare Reform
Keir Starmer's significant welfare cuts meet fierce opposition within Labour Party, sparking fears of internal division.
On Tuesday, the British Parliament saw Prime Minister Keir Starmer navigate through one of the most contentious moments in his leadership, as a substantial number of Labour lawmakers opposed crucial modifications to the nation’s social welfare program. Despite his success with the bill passing 335 to 260, Starmer’s leadership appears weakened following evident fractures in the Labour Party and intense internal debate regarding the proposed cuts.
The proposed changes aim to address Britain’s ballooning welfare costs by adjusting eligibility criteria for disability welfare programs, which could notably impact hundreds of thousands of citizens. Following relentless pressure from over 120 Labour members who threatened to derail the legislation, the government modified their stance, applying new eligibility rules solely to future claimants. This pivotal concession reduced expected savings from approximately £4.8 billion to £2 billion ($2.7 billion) annually by 2030, placing additional responsibility on Chancellor Rachel Reeves.
The fact that only 335 MPs supported the bill, out of more than 400 Labour members in Parliament, emphasizes the severity of the dissent faced by Starmer. Nonetheless, encouraged by the partial victory after making concessions, he attempts to steer the bill through the remaining legislative stages in the House of Commons in the coming week.
This uproar surrounding the UK welfare cuts casts a stark contrast to the situation in the United States, where there is limited opposition to a Republican-backed initiative that proposes extensive reductions in food benefits, threatening to exclude as many as 11 million Americans from health care coverage.