MINNEAPOLIS — Since its creation in 2018, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has been instrumental in warning election officials about foreign threats, teaching them how to safeguard polling places, and preparing them for emergencies. However, with recent cuts and restructuring, many states are left to ponder if they'll receive the same level of support in the future.
Concerns are mounting among election officials about CISA's commitment and capacity to safeguard critical election infrastructure as the 2026 midterms approach. Minnesota's Secretary of State, Steve Simon, stated, 'We do not have a sense of whether we can rely on CISA for these services as we approach a big election year in 2026.'
Amid these changes, state officials are scrambling to seek alternatives for essential cybersecurity services previously provided by CISA, including testing election equipment for vulnerabilities. Historically, CISA's guidance was invaluable, especially during emergencies or unforeseen events like disinformation campaigns.
Recent reports reveal a significant reduction in CISA staff, affecting its ability to support state elections adequately. The agency recently withdrew from key collaborations designed to enhance election security, leaving states like California discerning their own means to address rising challenges.
With a federal partnership that has often been crucial now diminished, Simon suggests many states, including Minnesota, must begin to explore how to fill the void left by CISA’s absence. The collective concern echoed by officials across various states signals an urgent call for clarity and assistance as the electoral landscape becomes increasingly complex.
