MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Plea negotiations with a Wisconsin judge accused of helping an immigrant evade federal agents are underway as her trial nears, according to the newly appointed federal prosecutor overseeing the case. Interim U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel stated that attorneys are 'discussing potential resolution' for Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan, though her team has not indicated willingness to accept any offer. A plea deal would represent a notable step back by prosecutors in a case that has become highly controversial amidst ongoing debates over immigration policy. Dugan's defense claims her innocence as they prepare for a trial set for next month.
Reports indicate that federal agents learned that an undocumented immigrant, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, was scheduled to appear before Dugan in a battery case. When agents arrived at the courthouse, Dugan allegedly facilitated Flores-Ruiz's escape, leading to a foot chase. He was eventually captured and deported.
Dugan was arrested a week after the incident and indicted on charges of obstruction of justice. Her trial is slated to begin on December 15, with her potential penalties reaching up to six years in prison if convicted. The case represents a larger conflict between local judicial authority and federal immigration enforcement, with criticism surrounding the actions taken against Dugan perceived as an example meant to intimidate other judicial figures opposing stringent immigration policies enacted during the Trump administration.
Reports indicate that federal agents learned that an undocumented immigrant, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, was scheduled to appear before Dugan in a battery case. When agents arrived at the courthouse, Dugan allegedly facilitated Flores-Ruiz's escape, leading to a foot chase. He was eventually captured and deported.
Dugan was arrested a week after the incident and indicted on charges of obstruction of justice. Her trial is slated to begin on December 15, with her potential penalties reaching up to six years in prison if convicted. The case represents a larger conflict between local judicial authority and federal immigration enforcement, with criticism surrounding the actions taken against Dugan perceived as an example meant to intimidate other judicial figures opposing stringent immigration policies enacted during the Trump administration.
