Jury Selection Begins for Wisconsin Judge Accused of Immigration Obstruction

Thu Dec 11 2025 09:54:31 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan faces charges of obstructing federal immigration authorities by helping a Mexican immigrant evade arrest. The jury selection process is underway as the trial is set to begin soon.

Hannah Dugan, a judge in Wisconsin, is accused of aiding Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a Mexican immigrant, to avoid arrest by federal agents. The trial highlights broader issues in immigration enforcement during the Trump administration. As jury selection starts, both the defense and prosecution are examining potential biases among jurors, especially given the political implications surrounding Dugan's case.

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A jury selection process began Thursday to determine who will serve on the jury in the trial of Hannah Dugan, a judge from Milwaukee County accused of helping a Mexican immigrant evade federal authorities.

Dugan faces federal charges of obstruction of justice and concealing a person from arrest, stemming from allegations that she facilitated Eduardo Flores-Ruiz's escape from law enforcement during a court appearance. If convicted, Dugan could face up to six years in prison.

Flores-Ruiz had illegally entered the United States and was due to appear in Dugan's courtroom in April when federal agents arrived to arrest him. Reports indicate Dugan's reaction to the agents' presence was to lead Flores-Ruiz out a back door, avoiding arrest at the courthouse.

The case comes amid heightened scrutiny of immigration policies under the Trump administration, with Dugan's defense contending that the charges against her reflect an attempt to intimidate judges who oppose those policies.

In a statement, Dugan's attorneys argued that she was acting within her judicial duties and had no malicious intent, claiming she was following court protocols regarding immigration arrests. They expressed concerns that extensive media coverage of the case may have biased the jury pool.

As part of the selection process, attorneys have posed questions about potential jurors' political affiliations and influences to assess any biases. The impaneled jurors will ultimately decide if Dugan's actions amounted to a crime.

This case raises significant questions regarding the intersection of judicial duty and immigration enforcement, making it a focal point in the national dialogue on these critical issues.