Skip to main content
MetaWorld Media
PoliticsA federal judge in Boston is set to consider a motion requiring the Trump administration to continue funding the SNAP food aid program despite the government shutdown, as Democratic officials argue the administration has a legal obligation to keep it operating.

Federal Court to Decide on SNAP Funding Amid Government Shutdown

A Boston federal judge evaluates a motion to keep the SNAP food aid program funded, which is crucial for millions of Americans.

Source: AP1 min read
Federal Court to Decide on SNAP Funding Amid Government Shutdown
Image via AP

In brief

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani will hear arguments regarding continued funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) amidst a government shutdown. As the USDA prepares to halt payments set for November 1, legal challenges have emerged from 25 states, including D.C., claiming that the administration must ensure the program's continuity, crucial for around 41 million beneficiaries.

BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge in Boston on Thursday will consider a motion that would require the Trump administration to continue funding the SNAP food aid program despite the government shutdown.

The hearing in front of U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani comes two days before the U.S. Department of Agriculture plans to freeze payments to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program because it said it can’t continue funding it due to the shutdown.

The program serves about 1 in 8 Americans and is a major piece of the nation’s social safety net. Word in October that it would be a Nov. 1 casualty of the shutdown sent states, food banks and SNAP recipients scrambling to figure out how to secure food. Some states said they would spend their funds to keep versions of the program going.

Democratic state attorneys general or governors from 25 states, as well as the District of Columbia, challenged the plan to pause the program, contending that the administration has a legal obligation to keep it running.

The administration said it wasn’t allowed to use a contingency fund with about $5 billion in it for the program, which reversed a USDA plan from before the shutdown that said that money would be tapped to keep SNAP running. The Democratic officials argued that not only could that money be used: it must be. They also said a separate fund with around $23 billion is available for the cause.

The program costs around $8 billion per month.

It wasn’t immediately clear how quickly the debit cards that beneficiaries use to buy groceries could be reloaded after the ruling. That process often takes one to two weeks.

To qualify for SNAP this year, a family of four’s net income can’t exceed the federal poverty line, or around $31,000 per year. Last year, SNAP provided assistance to 41 million people, nearly two-thirds of whom are families with children, according to the lawsuit.

Topics

More on this story