A BBC investigation reveals that some “Italian” tomato purees sold by major UK supermarkets likely include tomatoes sourced from China's Xinjiang province, where forced labour of Uyghurs occurs. This has led to widespread concerns about human rights violations linked to the supply chain and triggered responses from the supermarkets and NGOs.
UK Supermarkets Face Off Against Claims of Forced Labour in Tomato Supply Chain

UK Supermarkets Face Off Against Claims of Forced Labour in Tomato Supply Chain
Investigative report uncovers that popular “Italian” tomato purees in UK stores may contain tomatoes sourced from China, produced under forced labour conditions in Xinjiang.
The article text:
A recent BBC investigation has raised alarming concerns regarding popular “Italian” tomato purees sold by major UK supermarkets, suggesting that these products may contain tomatoes sourced from Chinese farms in the Xinjiang province, notorious for forced labour practices. The testing revealed that out of 64 analyzed tomato purees, 17 were likely made from Chinese tomatoes, casting a spotlight on ethical sourcing within the food industry.
Retailers such as Tesco, Asda, and Waitrose brand their products as “Italian,” with descriptions indicating the use of tomatoes that are purportedly grown in Italy. However, the results of the BBC's testing challenge these claims, particularly as many of these products are believed to contain tomatoes produced in conditions that may involve forced labour by Uyghur and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang.
The tomatoes grown in this region are reportedly linked to a broader system of human rights violations, where the Chinese government has detained over a million Uyghurs. Testimonies from former detainees revealing horrific accounts of forced labour in the tomato fields further underscore the gravity of the situation. Victims have reported brutal quotas and punishment for those who fail to meet guidelines within these facilities.
The investigation utilized advanced analytical techniques to determine the origin of the tomatoes, identifying a link between Xinjiang and Italy through shipping records. Despite their strong denials, several major retailers have come under scrutiny. Tesco has suspended supply following the claims, while Lidl confessed to having used Chinese tomatoes due to previous supply issues.
Antonio Petti, a prominent Italian tomato processing firm, figures prominently in the investigation. The company received substantial quantities of tomato paste from Xinjiang suppliers, sparking ire both within the retail and human rights communities. An undercover investigation further revealed the company's willingness to source cheaper Chinese tomatoes, highlighting a troubling disregard for ethical sourcing amidst prevailing market pressures.
Numerous supermarkets have mounted defenses against the allegations, conducting their own investigations and claiming the results contradict the BBC’s findings. Yet, as scrutiny intensifies, the topic of supply chain responsibility remains at the forefront of consumer consciousness.
Laws in the UK currently afford companies leeway in self-regulating their supply chains for forced labor, contrasting with stricter measures taken by the US. This raises concerns from advocates like Chloe Cranston of Anti-Slavery International, who fear that the UK may unwittingly become a refuge for products linked to forced labor due to inadequate oversight.
In light of the findings, further discussions about the true cost of food and the ethics of sourcing practices are becoming increasingly imperative. Questions about the compromises made for lower prices echo through the food industry, as stakeholders and consumers alike grapple with the implications of these revelations.
A recent BBC investigation has raised alarming concerns regarding popular “Italian” tomato purees sold by major UK supermarkets, suggesting that these products may contain tomatoes sourced from Chinese farms in the Xinjiang province, notorious for forced labour practices. The testing revealed that out of 64 analyzed tomato purees, 17 were likely made from Chinese tomatoes, casting a spotlight on ethical sourcing within the food industry.
Retailers such as Tesco, Asda, and Waitrose brand their products as “Italian,” with descriptions indicating the use of tomatoes that are purportedly grown in Italy. However, the results of the BBC's testing challenge these claims, particularly as many of these products are believed to contain tomatoes produced in conditions that may involve forced labour by Uyghur and other Muslim minorities in Xinjiang.
The tomatoes grown in this region are reportedly linked to a broader system of human rights violations, where the Chinese government has detained over a million Uyghurs. Testimonies from former detainees revealing horrific accounts of forced labour in the tomato fields further underscore the gravity of the situation. Victims have reported brutal quotas and punishment for those who fail to meet guidelines within these facilities.
The investigation utilized advanced analytical techniques to determine the origin of the tomatoes, identifying a link between Xinjiang and Italy through shipping records. Despite their strong denials, several major retailers have come under scrutiny. Tesco has suspended supply following the claims, while Lidl confessed to having used Chinese tomatoes due to previous supply issues.
Antonio Petti, a prominent Italian tomato processing firm, figures prominently in the investigation. The company received substantial quantities of tomato paste from Xinjiang suppliers, sparking ire both within the retail and human rights communities. An undercover investigation further revealed the company's willingness to source cheaper Chinese tomatoes, highlighting a troubling disregard for ethical sourcing amidst prevailing market pressures.
Numerous supermarkets have mounted defenses against the allegations, conducting their own investigations and claiming the results contradict the BBC’s findings. Yet, as scrutiny intensifies, the topic of supply chain responsibility remains at the forefront of consumer consciousness.
Laws in the UK currently afford companies leeway in self-regulating their supply chains for forced labor, contrasting with stricter measures taken by the US. This raises concerns from advocates like Chloe Cranston of Anti-Slavery International, who fear that the UK may unwittingly become a refuge for products linked to forced labor due to inadequate oversight.
In light of the findings, further discussions about the true cost of food and the ethics of sourcing practices are becoming increasingly imperative. Questions about the compromises made for lower prices echo through the food industry, as stakeholders and consumers alike grapple with the implications of these revelations.