Marles described the scale of China's military expansion as unprecedented since World War II, raising alarm not just over its magnitude but the opaque motivations behind it. Unlike China's approach, he highlighted Australia's commitment to transparency and strategic assurances regarding its own defense initiatives. His comments came in a backdrop of a largely unsupervised dialogue where criticism of China's activities gained traction among the United States and allied nations.

In response to questions about China's recent military exercises near Australian waters, Marles acknowledged that while disruptive, they were consistent with international law. This debate is ongoing as the US urges its partners to bolster defense spending amid rising concerns about China. Marles confirmed that Australia is taking steps to enhance its military capabilities, partially through the AUKUS agreement for nuclear-powered submarines, while lamenting China's absence from the summit.

Meanwhile, Teodoro reiterated the necessity for global opposition to what he termed China's "reckless" actions and the significance of preserving an international order that values freedom. The tension surrounding Taiwan was further compounded with warnings from US officials about China's ambitions, leading to a heated response from Beijing.

In conclusion, both Australia and the Philippines assert the need for ongoing dialogue and cooperation with the US and its allies to address perceived threats in the Asia-Pacific—highlighting the importance of mutual security and the reinforcement of international law in maintaining stability in the region.