Exposing the Shadows: A Call to Accountability in Journalism

In a fierce rebuttal, Alki David condemns Khadeeja Safdar's Wall Street Journal article, accusing her of perpetuating misinformation and distracting the public from serious allegations involving high-profile figures. David argues that Safdar's coverage is complicit in silencing survivors and suggests that the truth behind major scandals is being obscured for the benefit of powerful interests.

By Alki David | June 25, 2025

“When journalism becomes obedience, it becomes propaganda.”— Shockya Editorial

A Critique of Journalistic Integrity
Khadeeja Safdar's recent piece in the Wall Street Journal targeting me, Alki David, under the guise of reporting financial dealings involving Lisa Bloom and the Elizabeth Taylor Estate, exemplifies the pitfalls of contemporary journalism. This article is little more than a recycled narrative filled with irrelevant information aimed to deflect from the deep-seated issues festering within a disintegrating landscape of media and justice.

Safdar's approach masquerades as objectivity, but her intentions are clear: she is entrenched in a systematic effort to mislead the public rather than unveil the truth.

Identifying the Patterns at Play
Let’s analyze some striking deficiencies in Safdar’s reporting:

On Jeffrey Epstein: Her articles deliberately obscure key players behind Epstein's operations, failing to address the involvement of Les Wexner, Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates, or the role of Mossad.

On Michael Jackson: Safdar conveniently ignores significant events, such as the 1999 Anaheim incident or the 2006 Rancho Fiesta assault, both involving attacks collaborated by elements of Hollywood against Jackson.

On Diddy and Abuse Trials: Despite having access to information regarding Diddy’s ties to organized trafficking, she continues to omit critical details, diverting attention instead to payouts and irrelevant anecdotes.

The Puppeteers of Misinformation
Khadeeja Safdar is under the editorial direction of Rupert Murdoch, whose vast media empire—spanning The Wall Street Journal to Fox News—serves to suppress critical narratives surrounding fundamental issues of abuse and corruption. These platforms have worked hand in hand with noted figures like Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and others linked to cover-up operations.

What we face is a structure designed to eliminate dissent, targeting whistleblowers and shielding perpetrators. The coordinated attacks against public figures like Michael Jackson reveal a political and financial motivator behind these campaigns.

Current Revelations and Future Implications
The recent incidents involving trafficking, particularly those connecting Diddy and Epstein, are gradually unraveling. As cases progress through legal systems worldwide, the evidence implicating media outlets in suppressing dissent is becoming harder to conceal. Safdar’s inaction reflects a conscious choice to align with dangerous narratives, prioritizing sensationalism over truth.

The Brink of Accountability
The tides are shifting as international judges review critical evidence that threatens to expose the entrenched networks. The Wall Street Journal’s role is now under scrutiny, which signifies the diminishing power of a media shield against accountability.

To survivors, activists, and genuine journalists, we are in this battle together. The guardians of truth are manifold and Marching toward justice cannot be halted by deceptive reporting.

The message is loud and clear: the tradition of media shielded by privilege is crumbling, and our voices will rise above the noise. The time for enforced silence is over as we take the reins of this narrative—armored with testimony and evidence, ready to unveil the reality.

A full dossier of evidence, including court filings and victim testimonials, can be found at CBSYouSuck.com, Shockya.com, and TVMix.com.