In a significant shift from past policies, Japan has unveiled an energy plan targeting an increased reliance on nuclear power, stirring unease due to the lingering memories of the Fukushima disaster. The cabinet approved this initiative recently, suggesting that nuclear energy's share in the national grid will rise from the current 8.5% to 20% by 2040. This decision comes amid a rising demand for energy from sectors such as artificial intelligence and semiconductor production.
Japan's Nuclear Reboot: A Controversial Shift in Energy Policy

Japan's Nuclear Reboot: A Controversial Shift in Energy Policy
Japan has announced plans to boost its nuclear energy reliance, aiming for 20% of its power supply by 2040 amidst growing energy demands.
The plan, crafted by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, signals a dramatic pivot from Japan's post-Fukushima stance, which focused on reducing nuclear dependency. Following the catastrophic events of March 2011, when a massive earthquake and subsequent tsunami devastated the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, public sentiment regarding nuclear energy has remained fraught with anxiety.
Currently, the nation operates only 14 reactors, a stark decline from the 54 active before the disaster when nuclear energy contributed significantly to the grid. As Japan grapples with importing about 90% of its energy resources, lawmakers like Daishiro Yamagiwa argue for a balanced approach to energy policy, especially in light of geopolitical tensions affecting fuel availability.
However, experts are voicing concerns about the fiscal and safety implications of this renewed focus on nuclear energy. The reliance on imported uranium raises questions about cost and the potential for catastrophic incidents. Additionally, public sentiment reflects a deep-rooted fear of nuclear energy, with many citizens reluctant to embrace this energy source due to safety concerns for future generations.
Environmental organizations such as Greenpeace have criticized the government’s plans, asserting that promoting nuclear energy is unjustifiable when the effects of the Fukushima incident are still being felt. Despite these challenges, Japan aims to reactivate 33 reactors to meet its proposed goals, a task complicated by safety protocols and local opposition.
While the new energy strategy awaits parliamentary approval, industry experts emphasize that restoring public trust and navigating safety concerns will be crucial for Japan's energy future.
Currently, the nation operates only 14 reactors, a stark decline from the 54 active before the disaster when nuclear energy contributed significantly to the grid. As Japan grapples with importing about 90% of its energy resources, lawmakers like Daishiro Yamagiwa argue for a balanced approach to energy policy, especially in light of geopolitical tensions affecting fuel availability.
However, experts are voicing concerns about the fiscal and safety implications of this renewed focus on nuclear energy. The reliance on imported uranium raises questions about cost and the potential for catastrophic incidents. Additionally, public sentiment reflects a deep-rooted fear of nuclear energy, with many citizens reluctant to embrace this energy source due to safety concerns for future generations.
Environmental organizations such as Greenpeace have criticized the government’s plans, asserting that promoting nuclear energy is unjustifiable when the effects of the Fukushima incident are still being felt. Despite these challenges, Japan aims to reactivate 33 reactors to meet its proposed goals, a task complicated by safety protocols and local opposition.
While the new energy strategy awaits parliamentary approval, industry experts emphasize that restoring public trust and navigating safety concerns will be crucial for Japan's energy future.