**A federal judge is set to confront the Trump administration regarding ongoing deportation flights despite a judicial order prohibiting such actions.**
**Judge Questions U.S. Deportation Plans Amid Legal Challenges**

**Judge Questions U.S. Deportation Plans Amid Legal Challenges**
**Federal judge challenges Trump administration's defiance over deportations during hearing.**
Judge James E. Boasberg is gearing up to question officials from the Trump administration during a scheduled hearing this coming Monday. The focus is on deportation flights that recently transported over 200 immigrants to El Salvador, raising concerns about whether these actions breach a court order that mandates due process for detained noncitizens. The judge's inquiry comes on the heels of defiant comments made by Tom Homan, the Trump administration's "border czar," who stated on Fox News that deportations would continue "no matter what" the courts decide.
Homan highlighted that among those deported were individuals alleged to be part of the Tren de Aragua gang, asserting that deportation flights would happen "every day." The unfolding situation manifests a growing rift between the federal judiciary, which has sought to check several executive actions by President Trump, and the administration, which appears increasingly willing to bypass court orders.
President Trump also weighed in, exhibiting skepticism regarding a separate ruling from a federal judge in California that compelled the reinstatement of thousands of terminated workers. He remarked on the judge's overreach, positioning himself against the will of the electorate, which he claims voted in favor of his administration by nearly 80 million votes. As the legal confrontation escalates, the implications for the balance of power between the branches of government loom large.
Homan highlighted that among those deported were individuals alleged to be part of the Tren de Aragua gang, asserting that deportation flights would happen "every day." The unfolding situation manifests a growing rift between the federal judiciary, which has sought to check several executive actions by President Trump, and the administration, which appears increasingly willing to bypass court orders.
President Trump also weighed in, exhibiting skepticism regarding a separate ruling from a federal judge in California that compelled the reinstatement of thousands of terminated workers. He remarked on the judge's overreach, positioning himself against the will of the electorate, which he claims voted in favor of his administration by nearly 80 million votes. As the legal confrontation escalates, the implications for the balance of power between the branches of government loom large.