Geert Wilders, leader of the Party for Freedom, announced his withdrawal from the Dutch coalition, citing an impasse on immigration reforms that may lead to new elections.
Geert Wilders Exits Dutch Coalition Amid Immigration Dispute

Geert Wilders Exits Dutch Coalition Amid Immigration Dispute
Far-right leader's withdrawal raises prospects of a government collapse and new elections.
In a decisive political shift, Geert Wilders, the far-right leader of the Netherlands' largest political party, has pulled his ministers from the governing coalition, citing frustrations with the coalition's slow progress on immigration control. This unexpected move is poised to escalate tensions and potentially unravel a government that was formed less than a year ago.
Wilders, via a post on social media platform X, emphasized that the decision stemmed from his partners’ refusal to endorse his proposals aimed at rapidly addressing migration issues. He stated, "No signature for our migration plans,” indicating his party's significant insistence on stricter immigration measures.
The Party for Freedom, known for its controversial stances that include propositions to ban the Quran, shut down Islamic schools, and completely suspend the intake of asylum seekers, emerged as a dominant force in the November 2023 elections. Their success shocked the traditional political framework of the Netherlands.
Wilders had successfully united his party with three other right-wing factions: the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, a center-right group; the Farmer Citizen Movement, which focuses on rural interests; and the New Social Contract, a centrist political entity. Collectively, these four parties control 88 seats out of the 150 available in the House of Representatives.
The ramifications of this coalition collapse could lead to a political vacuum in the Netherlands, triggering new elections and heightening uncertainties in the Dutch political landscape. As the situation continues to evolve, observers will be keenly watching how the remaining parties respond and whether they can mount a cohesive approach to governance without Wilders' faction.