In a significant legal decision, a federal judge has extended a block on a controversial directive from the Trump administration intended to significantly cut the U.S. Agency for International Development (U.S.A.I.D.).
Judge Prolongs Block on Trump Administration's U.S.A.I.D. Dismantling Plan

Judge Prolongs Block on Trump Administration's U.S.A.I.D. Dismantling Plan
Federal judge issues temporary restraining order against Trump administration's directive affecting U.S.A.I.D. employees and overseas workers.
February 13, 2025, saw Judge Carl Nichols of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia announce that a temporary restraining order would remain in effect for another week, halting actions that would place approximately 2,700 U.S.A.I.D. employees on administrative leave and require those stationed overseas to return to the U.S. within a month. The judge is expected to reach a ruling by the end of next week on whether to grant a preliminary injunction that would serve to indefinitely block the administration's initiative.
The Trump administration's proposal, heavily influenced by tech billionaire Elon Musk, aimed to shutter the agency that has been a target of criticism from both Trump and Musk. The directive is alleged to violate constitutional rights according to a lawsuit filed by unions representing affected U.S.A.I.D. staff, namely the American Foreign Service Association and the American Federation of Government Employees. These organizations argue that the executive order, which includes a 90-day freeze on foreign aid and directives to dismantle parts of U.S.A.I.D., lacks constitutional legitimacy.
Democratic legislators, U.S.A.I.D. workers, and various aid organizations have condemned the proposed dismantling and insist it is illegal. The agency's existence is established by federal law, and its funding, like other government operations, has been approved through Congress until March 14. This ongoing legal battle highlights the broader implications of administrative decisions on international aid and workforce stability.
The Trump administration's proposal, heavily influenced by tech billionaire Elon Musk, aimed to shutter the agency that has been a target of criticism from both Trump and Musk. The directive is alleged to violate constitutional rights according to a lawsuit filed by unions representing affected U.S.A.I.D. staff, namely the American Foreign Service Association and the American Federation of Government Employees. These organizations argue that the executive order, which includes a 90-day freeze on foreign aid and directives to dismantle parts of U.S.A.I.D., lacks constitutional legitimacy.
Democratic legislators, U.S.A.I.D. workers, and various aid organizations have condemned the proposed dismantling and insist it is illegal. The agency's existence is established by federal law, and its funding, like other government operations, has been approved through Congress until March 14. This ongoing legal battle highlights the broader implications of administrative decisions on international aid and workforce stability.