In brief
Judge Hannah Dugan, charged with helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal agents, will have her trial begin on December 11, as scheduled. Despite ongoing plea negotiations, Dugan's legal team insists on her innocence, claiming she was fulfilling her duties as a judge. The trial could highlight tensions surrounding immigration policy under the Trump administration.
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal judge announced today that the trial for Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan, accused of illegally aiding an undocumented immigrant evade federal agents, will move forward as planned on December 11. The announcement comes despite ongoing discussions about a potential plea deal, which Dugan has shown little interest in. U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman confirmed during a hearing that jury selection is still set to begin next month. Dugan faces serious charges of obstruction and concealment, stemming from an incident in April where she allegedly aided immigrant Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who was standing trial for battery, in avoiding arrest by federal agents waiting outside her courtroom.Documents reveal that Dugan led Flores-Ruiz through a private exit at the Milwaukee County Courthouse after learning of the agents' presence, though he was ultimately captured following a foot pursuit. Flores-Ruiz has since been deported, according to the Department of Homeland Security.If found guilty on both counts, Dugan could face a prison sentence of up to six years. Her defense team argues she was acting within her scope as a judge and maintains her innocence. U.S. Attorney Brad Schimel acknowledged plea discussions but stated that no formal agreements have been made.During the hearing, both parties addressed logistics regarding jury selection, with 34 potential jurors dismissed due to biases, and discussions about the use of courtroom recordings as evidence. The trial is expected to feature testimony from numerous witnesses, including federal immigration agents.Dugan’s case underscores the significant disputes between local judicial bodies and the Trump administration regarding immigration enforcement. While prosecutors aim to press forward, the tension surrounding the case reflects broader conversations about judicial independence and immigration policies.
