A decisive meeting in South Korea intended to create a comprehensive treaty on plastic pollution has ended in failure after oil-producing nations opposed key reduction commitments. With only 10% of plastic being recycled, environmentalists express concern as countries seek to address the mounting crisis.
U.N. Plastic Pollution Treaty Negotiations Fail Amidst Oil State Opposition
U.N. Plastic Pollution Treaty Negotiations Fail Amidst Oil State Opposition
Crucial talks aimed at tackling global plastic pollution stumble as nearly 100 oil-producing countries resist a legally binding agreement.
Countries worldwide have struggled to find consensus on a significant treaty to address plastic pollution, culminating in a setback during the recent negotiations in Busan, South Korea. More than 200 nations gathered for discussions that aimed to establish a binding agreement, but divisions between nearly 100 "high ambition" nations advocating for gradual phase-out of plastic usage, and key oil-producing countries, proved unbridgeable.
The Kuwait negotiator articulated the sentiment of many oil-dependent nations, stating, "The objective of this treaty is to end plastic pollution not plastic itself; plastic has brought immense benefits to societies worldwide." This reflects a broader concern among major oil producers about the potential negative impact on economic development from stringent regulations on plastic production.
The urgency for action emerges from staggering statistics: since 1950, over eight billion tonnes of plastic have been generated globally, but less than 10% has been recycled, leading to millions of tonnes contaminating marine environments. This accumulation poses severe threats to the health of wildlife and disrupts ecosystems as creatures ingest or become ensnared in plastic debris.
The meeting was initially projected to conclude negotiations after two years of talks prompted by the global recognition of the need to tackle plastic pollution, particularly regarding its effects on marine life. Nevertheless, by the end of the final round, a commitment to cut plastic production was still contentious, specifically concerning Article 6 of the proposed treaty.
Key nations, including the UK, EU, African Group, and several South American nations, were unified in championing a legally binding commitment to reduce plastic production levels. Mexico's chief negotiator, Camila Zepeda, rallied support, insisting the aspect of the treaty was crucial for protecting both citizens and the environment. Her impassioned plea was counteracted by resistance from oil-producing nations, which voiced apprehensions about potential economic repercussions.
Additional dissent arose from India, which echoed concerns that pledges to cut production could infringe upon its developmental rights. Meanwhile, environmental organizations voiced their dismay, citing the palpable influence of the fossil fuel sector during treaty negotiations. InfluenceMap, a research body, documented extensive lobbying efforts by petrochemical companies against commitments to limit plastic output.
Despite the collapse of negotiations, collaboration may still be possible among the 95 countries seeking stricter regulations. Eirik Lindebjerg from the WWF highlighted the widespread desire for progress and advocated that this group should push forward with its own treaty, emphasizing the transformative potential such an agreement could have on addressing the plastic pollution crisis.
As stakeholders prepare for follow-up discussions in the coming year, there remains a strong need for a united global approach to tackle the ongoing environmental and health hazards posed by plastic pollution. Environmentalists and major corporations alike are calling for clarity and actionable commitments, recognizing that the current stalemate only prolongs the crisis.
