Indonesia's Military Law Rewrite Sparks Outrage, Fears of Authoritarianism

Following Indonesia's parliament's recent approval of controversial military law changes, critics and pro-democracy activists express fears of a return to authoritarian rule akin to Suharto's era. The amendments allow active military personnel to ascend to civilian government roles, raising concerns over potential democratic erosions in the country.

Indonesia's parliament has ignited widespread anger with its approval of revisions to military law that significantly expand the Indonesian military's role in governance. Critics warn that these changes threaten to reverse the progress made in democracy since the fall of Suharto's authoritarian regime in 1998.

The amendments, supported by President Prabowo Subianto—who had ties to Suharto—allow serving military officers to occupy posts in 14 civilian institutions without mandatory retirement or resignation. With fears growing, hundreds of pro-democracy activists have camped outside the parliament to voice their discontent, stating that such militarization of government undermines democratic values.

"The essence of democracy is that the military should not engage in politics," states Wilson, a member of the Indonesian Association of Families of the Disappeared. The revisions also increase the maximum retirement age for officers, allowing four-star generals to serve until 63. This move has intensified the protests, which saw nearly a thousand gathered outside parliament by Thursday evening, waving banners with messages like "Return the military to the barracks!" and "Against militarism and oligarchy."

For decades, reforms have aimed to limit the military's political influence; however, a local human rights watchdog noted that even before this recent law, thousands of active officers were already in civilian roles. Observers interpret the law's passing as facilitating an expansion of power for Prabowo, alarming many who remember the authoritarian practices of the past.

Analysts assert the legislation reflects a potential shift in policy direction towards prioritizing state control over democratic governance. It's feared that Prabowo's ongoing embrace of military support for public initiatives, such as a significant free-meal program for children and pregnant women, may further entwine the military's role in public life.

Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin justified the amendments by stating they are necessary for adapting to global military demands, emphasizing the military's duty to protect national sovereignty. However, human rights advocates caution that expanding military influence in governmental functions could jeopardize civilian autonomy and accountability, particularly in the justice system.

"How can active-duty officers in the Attorney General's Office remain impartial when still bound by military command?" questioned Virdika Rizky Utama, a Jakarta-based researcher. Critics argue these fears are echoed by the newly passed law, contradicting the government’s purported commitment to human rights.

In response to the passed amendments, activists remain steadfast, asserting that the struggle for democracy is far from over. "This long struggle cannot stop just because the law has been passed. There is only one word: Resist," declared Sukma Ayu, a university student challenging the regime, vowing to sustain protests until their demands are met.