President Javier Milei has announced Argentina’s withdrawal from the WHO, echoing former President Trump's criticism of the organization’s pandemic response. This move reflects a broader trend of aligning with Trump's controversial approach to international relations.
Argentina Follows Trump’s Lead: President Milei Withdraws from WHO

Argentina Follows Trump’s Lead: President Milei Withdraws from WHO
Javier Milei mirrors Donald Trump's policies by announcing Argentina's exit from the World Health Organization, citing a controversial stance on pandemic measures.
Amid a wave of populism sweeping through Latin America, Argentine President Javier Milei has announced his decision to withdraw the country from the World Health Organization (WHO). This decision, made public on Wednesday, aligns closely with former President Donald Trump's earlier exit from the organization, underscoring a significant pivot in Argentina's global stance.
Milei condemned the WHO for endorsing what he termed "draconian lockdowns" during the COVID-19 pandemic, referring to these measures as "one of the most egregious crimes against humanity in history." He expressed dissatisfaction with what he perceives as the organization's role in enforcing extensive social control strategies. "That’s why we have decided to withdraw from such a nefarious organization," he asserted.
This move is reminiscent of Trump's aggressive critique of international alliances during his administration, as he also withdrew the United States from the WHO shortly after taking office, citing dissatisfaction with its pandemic response and financial contributions. Milei, who previously authored a critique of pandemic policies, now finds a growing alignment with Trump's political principles, despite Argentina's historical partnerships.
As both countries initiate plans to exit the WHO, they will be among a few nations alongside Liechtenstein that do not maintain membership in the UN's global health alliance. This trend symbolizes Milei's commitment to reversing Argentina's integration into traditional diplomatic frameworks, favoring a more nationalist agenda at the potential expense of its prior international relationships.