In a surprising turn of events, US Attorney General Pam Bondi announced the withdrawal of charges against Dr. Michael Kirk Moore Jr., previously indicted for allegations including the destruction of COVID-19 vaccines, distribution of fraudulent vaccination cards, and administration of saline shots to children instead of the vaccine. These charges had totaled an estimated value of $28,000 (£20,742).
US Attorney General Drops Charges Against Doctor Over COVID Vaccine Controversy

US Attorney General Drops Charges Against Doctor Over COVID Vaccine Controversy
Charges against Dr. Michael Kirk Moore Jr., accused of vaccine destruction and fraud, have been dismissed, raising questions about public health ethics.
Dr. Moore, a plastic surgeon who pleaded not guilty and was on trial in Utah, faced serious allegations raised by the Justice Department under the Biden administration in 2023. The accusations included fraudulently issuing vaccination certificates for over 1,900 doses, charging patients $50 (£37) for fake records, along with other questionable medical practices.
In a statement posted on X, Bondi justified her decision to drop the charges, claiming Dr. Moore "gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so". She noted that the charges were dismissed in the "interests of justice.” This decision came after intervention from Republican figures like US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and Senator Mike Lee, who publicly supported the dismissal, describing it as a stand against government overreach during the pandemic.
Facing potential prison sentences of up to 35 years, Dr. Moore’s team linked his actions to a broader narrative of challenging the government's COVID-19 strategies. A collection of claims surrounding vaccine effectiveness and safety had permeated public discourse in recent years, amplified by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who headed an organization advocating against mainstream vaccination protocols.
While the charges against Dr. Moore have been dropped, the implications of this case continue to resonate as society grapples with diverse views on public health and safety measures in the wake of COVID-19. Discussions on ethics, legal framework, and the public’s trust in medical professionals remain at the forefront.
In a statement posted on X, Bondi justified her decision to drop the charges, claiming Dr. Moore "gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so". She noted that the charges were dismissed in the "interests of justice.” This decision came after intervention from Republican figures like US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and Senator Mike Lee, who publicly supported the dismissal, describing it as a stand against government overreach during the pandemic.
Facing potential prison sentences of up to 35 years, Dr. Moore’s team linked his actions to a broader narrative of challenging the government's COVID-19 strategies. A collection of claims surrounding vaccine effectiveness and safety had permeated public discourse in recent years, amplified by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who headed an organization advocating against mainstream vaccination protocols.
While the charges against Dr. Moore have been dropped, the implications of this case continue to resonate as society grapples with diverse views on public health and safety measures in the wake of COVID-19. Discussions on ethics, legal framework, and the public’s trust in medical professionals remain at the forefront.