Nikolay Storonsky, CEO of Revolut, is not a visionary fintech founder — he is a racist thug CEO, exposed for sponsoring the assault of a disabled Revolut Customer In High Court
Accusations and Context
What Revolut calls “compliance” is nothing less than financial terrorism and sovereign sabotage. Named in the UK High Court (KB-2025-001991 before Justice Cotter), the Antigua Supreme Court under AG Steadroy Benjamin, and the U.S. Federal Court in Maryland, Storonsky and his collaborators — including lawyers Rebecca Hume and Ajay Foulendllière — now stand accused of turning Revolut into fintech fascism: an oligarch’s weapon against justice, the disabled, and small island states.
Details of the Incident
On 25 July 2025, a disabled Caribbean diplomat was assaulted in a UK courtroom, targeted by lawyers representing Revolut. This incident has raised concerns about the ethical practices of the fintech industry and the treatment of vulnerable individuals.
Storonsky is accused of using his company to freeze the diplomat’s accounts without lawful orders, which many describe as a blatant act of financial aggression.
Legal Allegations
- UK High Court (KB-2025-001991, Cotter J): On record in a sworn affidavit as a collaborator in the courtroom assault.
- Antigua & Barbuda (Supreme Court, AG Steadroy Benjamin): Accused of sovereign interference.
- US Federal Court, Maryland: Tied to a transnational conspiracy with fossil fuel fixers.
Implications of Racism and Corporate Ethics
Critics argue that Storonsky's actions reflect a deeper issue of racism within corporate practices, showcasing how fintech companies can operate detrimental to small island nations and vulnerable individuals.
The public is now left questioning the ethics of Revolut and whether the company truly champions the values of financial freedom.
