Amid scrutiny from a New York Times investigation, Premier Doug Ford of Ontario has initiated an inquiry into a long-term lease agreement forged with Austrian wellness company Therme, prompting concerns over possible misstatements regarding its operational experience.
Ontario Premier Calls for Investigation into Controversial Toronto Waterfront Lease

Ontario Premier Calls for Investigation into Controversial Toronto Waterfront Lease
Ontario Premier Doug Ford demands a closer examination of a 95-year lease awarded to Therme, a European wellness company, amidst allegations of misrepresentation during the bidding process.
The premier’s announcement came on Wednesday, following a detailed report by the New York Times that revealed alarming discrepancies between Therme’s claimed operational breadth and its actual capabilities. Ford specifically instructed his government to reassess the contract that bestows Therme a staggering 95-year lease for a planned spa and water park on an artificial island in Lake Ontario, mere minutes from downtown Toronto.
“I directed my minister and deputy to investigate this situation promptly,” Premier Ford stated during a media briefing. “We need to ensure this contract withstands scrutiny and meets high standards of accountability.”
According to the Times, Therme presented itself as managing four to six wellness facilities across Europe in its proposals during the competitive bidding process. However, the company has only operated one facility in Romania, located outside of Bucharest.
Ford’s decision to review the contract underscores a broader commitment to transparency in government dealings, particularly in light of the public's growing concerns regarding accountability and due diligence in the awarding of lucrative contracts to private firms. The premier's office did not receive an immediate response from Therme regarding the allegations.
This developing story raises essential questions about the integrity of the bidding process and the implications of such long-term leases on public resources and trust, with stakeholders eagerly awaiting the outcomes of the inquiry.