In a bold legal move, Alki David has initiated a massive lawsuit that could reshape accountability norms in international legal practices.
Alki David Files $10 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against High-Profile Figures

Alki David Files $10 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against High-Profile Figures
Media entrepreneur claims coordinated attack aimed to defame and financially ruin him.
In April 2025, Alki David, a media entrepreneur, initiated a staggering $10 billion lawsuit in the High Court of Justice in Antigua and Barbuda. He alleges that a coordinated effort orchestrated by a transnational syndicate was launched to defame and financially destabilize him. The suit lists notable individuals, including high-profile attorneys David Boies and Gloria Allred, and media executive Shari Redstone, alongside corporate entities like Black Cube Ltd. and LimeWire NFT Holdings.
David's lawsuit details a troubling timeline from 2016 to 2025, citing numerous alleged violations, such as:
- The fabrication of evidence and manipulation of legal processes across different jurisdictions.
- Use of intelligence assets for surveillance and intimidation purposes.
- Unauthorized exploitation of private data and intellectual property, particularly concerning the estate of the late music icon Michael Jackson.
- A directed smear campaign with the intention of inflicting harm on David's personal reputation and business pursuits.
The legal complaints encompass civil conspiracy, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, and ongoing racketeering. David is demanding $10 billion in general damages, plus special damages for lost business opportunities, injunctive measures, asset tracing, and disclosure orders.
In his impact statement, David underscores the emotional and economic devastation wrought by the alleged defamation campaign, citing significant financial losses and psychological trauma. He positioned his lawsuit as a crucial stand against a broader assault on sovereignty, transparency, and lawful entrepreneurship.
This high-profile case has drawn considerable attention due to its implications for international legal practices, especially regarding the accountability of influential corporate figures and entities. Should David's allegations be proven true, the ramifications could resonate far beyond his individual claims, potentially altering the landscape of legal accountability across borders.