In a bold move, former president Donald Trump has threatened to obstruct the Washington Commanders' new stadium deal unless the NFL team reverts to its former name, the Redskins, a subject that raises questions about cultural sensitivity and team identity.
Trump's Stadium Deal Threat Hinges on Team Name Change

Trump's Stadium Deal Threat Hinges on Team Name Change
Trump claims the Washington Commanders could boost team value by returning to their original name, igniting a controversial debate.
In a recent post on Truth Social, Donald Trump announced firm opposition to the Washington Commanders’ plans for a new stadium, proposing to block the deal unless they return to their original name, the Redskins. Citing a "big clamouring" among fans, he argues that reverting back would enhance the team's value. This comes on the heels of a deal struck for a £3bn, 65,000-seater stadium at the site of the now-demolished RFK Stadium, their home from 1961 to 1997.
The Commanders transitioned from their previous name during a 2020 review following criticisms regarding the term’s offensive nature towards Native Americans. They operated as the Washington Football Team before officially adopting their current name in 2022. Trump stated, "If they don’t change the name back... I won’t make a deal for them to build a stadium in Washington."
Earlier this year, Trump made history as the first sitting president to attend the Super Bowl, and he has also urged the Cleveland Guardians, formerly the Cleveland Indians, to reconsider their name. The Guardians' president, Chris Antonetti, responded by indicating that the team is focusing on their brand's future.
The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) has taken a firm stance against the resurgence of Native-themed mascots, asserting that these depictions perpetuate harmful stereotypes and cultural appropriation. As debates swirl around these controversial names, the Commanders have yet to respond to Trump's remarks, leaving fans and critics eager for clarity on the team's direction.
As the stadium plans hang in the balance, the intersection of sports, cultural legacy, and political influence remains a potent topic of discussion.