The decision by NOAA comes amid a broader trend within the Trump administration to minimize the scope of climate research. This includes the dismissal of key contributors to the nation’s climate assessment and proposed cuts to funding for relevant studies across various government departments. Experts warn that the discontinuation of this data collection leaves both federal and state governments at a disadvantage, forced to navigate climate change impacts without essential information. Jesse M. Keenan from Tulane University emphasized that eliminating the database puts the government “flying blind” in its efforts to manage extreme weather costs. Senator Ed Markey further criticized the decision as an "anti-science" stance detrimental to public safety and national interests.
U.S. Government Halts Tracking of Extreme Weather Costs
U.S. Government Halts Tracking of Extreme Weather Costs
The Trump administration's latest decision complicates analysis of climate-related disasters.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has announced a significant change in policy that will cease the tracking of costs associated with extreme weather events, particularly those resulting in at least $1 billion in damages. This move raises concerns among researchers and policymakers, as it restricts crucial data needed to assess the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters linked to climate change. Critics argue that without this information, decision-making regarding infrastructure and disaster preparedness is severely hampered.
