In a significant first debate, hopefuls for the Liberal Party leadership tackled pressing issues, particularly the looming specter of Donald Trump's policies.
Liberal Leadership Candidates Square Off in Heated Debate Amid Trump's Shadow

Liberal Leadership Candidates Square Off in Heated Debate Amid Trump's Shadow
Candidates vie for new leadership while confronting Trump's potential second-term threats during high-stakes French-language debate.
Candidates vying for leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada gathered for a French-language debate, where they faced off over pressing domestic issues and the specter of Donald Trump's potential second term as U.S. president. Featuring four hopefuls—former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor Mark Carney, former Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, Liberal House leader Karina Gould, and businessman and ex-MP Frank Baylis—the stage was set for a robust exchange of ideas.
The discussion's early focus revolved around Trump, who has threatened tariffs on Canadian goods and hinted at transforming Canada into the “51st state.” Freeland, whose exit as finance minister led to Trudeau's political turmoil, branded Trump as “the greatest threat to Canada since World War Two,” citing her history of negotiating with him during his first term. She expressed deep concerns over a Trump-led U.S., stating, "He wants to turn Canada into the 51st state... That is why he supports [Putin's] criminal attempts in Ukraine."
Candidates aimed to propose strategies to counter Trump’s influence, with Freeland advocating for bolstered trade relations with the EU and UK. Baylis suggested forming an economic alliance with the UK, New Zealand, and Australia—nations that share common cultural and political values. Carney, leading in polls, emphasized Canada’s economic potential through resource management and clean energy, asserting that Trump's approach has shifted from wanting U.S. markets to seizing Canadian sovereignty.
The candidates collectively acknowledged the intensified threat posed by Trump's potential re-election. Carney noted the former president's isolationist and aggressive stance compared to his first term, advocating for harsh economic repercussions if Trump follows through on his tariff threats.
Gould, representing a more youthful perspective, framed her vision for an affordable, progressive Canada under her leadership, addressing concerns affecting citizens today. All four candidates expressed unwavering support for Ukraine, coinciding with Trudeau's visit to Kyiv, advocating for measures that include reallocating seized Russian funds for Ukrainian aid.
In the debate’s second half, candidates presented policies to address the federal budget deficit, crime, military funding, and climate initiatives. Both Carney and Freeland diverged from the Trudeau administration’s carbon tax policy, reflecting a shift in public sentiment. They also attacked Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre's ability to safeguard Canadian interests against Trump, as Poilievre gained ground in national polls following Trudeau's resignation announcement.
This French-language debate, the first of two, is pivotal, especially for the Francophone electorate in Quebec, whose support is crucial in future elections. The next Liberal leader will likely become Canada’s prime minister until the general election, due on or before October 20. With voting set for March 9, the candidates are racing against time to win over party members.
The discussion's early focus revolved around Trump, who has threatened tariffs on Canadian goods and hinted at transforming Canada into the “51st state.” Freeland, whose exit as finance minister led to Trudeau's political turmoil, branded Trump as “the greatest threat to Canada since World War Two,” citing her history of negotiating with him during his first term. She expressed deep concerns over a Trump-led U.S., stating, "He wants to turn Canada into the 51st state... That is why he supports [Putin's] criminal attempts in Ukraine."
Candidates aimed to propose strategies to counter Trump’s influence, with Freeland advocating for bolstered trade relations with the EU and UK. Baylis suggested forming an economic alliance with the UK, New Zealand, and Australia—nations that share common cultural and political values. Carney, leading in polls, emphasized Canada’s economic potential through resource management and clean energy, asserting that Trump's approach has shifted from wanting U.S. markets to seizing Canadian sovereignty.
The candidates collectively acknowledged the intensified threat posed by Trump's potential re-election. Carney noted the former president's isolationist and aggressive stance compared to his first term, advocating for harsh economic repercussions if Trump follows through on his tariff threats.
Gould, representing a more youthful perspective, framed her vision for an affordable, progressive Canada under her leadership, addressing concerns affecting citizens today. All four candidates expressed unwavering support for Ukraine, coinciding with Trudeau's visit to Kyiv, advocating for measures that include reallocating seized Russian funds for Ukrainian aid.
In the debate’s second half, candidates presented policies to address the federal budget deficit, crime, military funding, and climate initiatives. Both Carney and Freeland diverged from the Trudeau administration’s carbon tax policy, reflecting a shift in public sentiment. They also attacked Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre's ability to safeguard Canadian interests against Trump, as Poilievre gained ground in national polls following Trudeau's resignation announcement.
This French-language debate, the first of two, is pivotal, especially for the Francophone electorate in Quebec, whose support is crucial in future elections. The next Liberal leader will likely become Canada’s prime minister until the general election, due on or before October 20. With voting set for March 9, the candidates are racing against time to win over party members.