**Historic Peace Deal Signed Between DR Congo and Rwanda in Washington**

The peace treaty, celebrated by leaders, faces skepticism due to past failures in the region.

In a significant diplomatic breakthrough, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) have officially signed a peace deal in Washington, designed to put an end to over two decades of conflict between the neighboring nations. The deal, which was framed by U.S. President Donald Trump as a momentous victory, emphasizes the need for "disengagement, disarmament, and conditional integration" of the various armed factions within eastern DR Congo, a region plagued by violence and humanitarian crises.

The signing ceremony took place in the Oval Office, attended by Trump, Vice-President JD Vance, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who all expressed optimism regarding the potential for lasting peace. "Today, the violence and destruction comes to an end, and the entire region begins a new chapter of hope and opportunity," declared Trump during the event.

Although the pact is the result of a "declaration of principles" established earlier this year, skepticism looms given the frequent breakdowns of previous peace agreements in the area. The Congolese presidential office hailed the agreement as a landmark achievement, but as history shows, the road to peace can be filled with obstacles.

The renewed conflict in DR Congo escalated earlier in the year when M23 rebels gained control over significant territories, including the strategic city of Goma. Amid rising tensions, the Congolese government sought assistance from the U.S., potentially offering mineral rights in exchange for security guarantees. Eastern DR Congo is noted for its rich mineral deposits, particularly coltan, which is instrumental for global technology industries.

While Rwanda denies having supported the M23 rebels, accusations abound, with both nations trading blame regarding the involvement of rebel groups in the ongoing conflict. The deal aims to stipulate conditions for territorial respect and the facilitation of refugee returns but does not explicitly include the withdrawal of Rwandan troops stationed in DR Congo.

The agreement's ambiguities raise crucial questions: Will the M23 rebel group respect ceasefire terms? Does the agreement imply Rwanda's acknowledgment of its military presence in DR Congo? Notably, the lack of explicit clauses regarding troop withdrawal points to ongoing tensions that need clarification.

As with prior attempts at peace, the success of this accord hinges on genuine cooperation and fulfilled commitments from both parties to curb hostilities and ensure the safety of civilians affected by years of conflict. The international community is watching closely, hoping this agreement can lead to a more stable future for the region.